2021-12-30

Choose the issue you want to discuss in depth; Discuss the selected issue from multiple perspectives at a certain level, reasoning must be based, the problem must be clearly and thoroughly explained

2021-12-30

Highlight the innovativeness of your research, showcasing distinct features that set you apart from others. The degree of differentiation is another matter, but the key is to have some form of contrast. As long as there is a distinction, it can be considered innovative

2021-12-28

What is a deep discussion and how to deepen the discussion?

2021-12-26

How to highlight the innovativeness of an article in a discussion?

2021-10-29

Unable to submit the manuscript.

2019-10-25

Well said

2017-07-14

Cross the one-point threshold, may the gods bless us!! Let's aim for more than two points next year

2016-06-11

Review Speed: 12.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted in November 2015, reviewed over two months later, received revisions at the end of February 2016. Resubmitted in early March, no response since then, resubmitted again in mid to late April, accepted after two months of review. Although it was accepted, it is not recommended to submit to small journals with an annual publication of only around 80 articles, low impact factor, the review process is really long! Overall, even estimating it to be faster, it still takes around 9 months

2015-10-20

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The review speed of the journal is relatively slow, there is a page fee, hoping for an increase in Impact Factor

2011-05-07

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: A case report on children with acetabular osteoid osteoma leading to joint deformity was submitted, and the condition was observed for 1 year. The data was detailed, and the article was accepted for publication directly after 49 days of submission