MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Chemical Engineering Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering |
107 / 273 | |
Category: Chemical Engineering Subcategory: Materials Chemistry |
127 / 317 | |
Category: Chemical Engineering Subcategory: Polymers and Plastics |
66 / 161 | |
Category: Chemical Engineering Subcategory: Organic Chemistry |
93 / 211 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: POLYMER SCIENCE | SCIE | Q2 | 45/95 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: POLYMER SCIENCE | SCIE | Q3 | 48/95 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE | 244 | 48.70 |
Polymer Reviews | 79 | 24.80 |
Carbohydrate Polymers | 172 | 22.40 |
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE | 214 | 17.10 |
POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY | 139 | 10.10 |
EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL | 120 | 9.90 |
BIOMACROMOLECULES | 193 | 10.60 |
MACROMOLECULES | 288 | 9.30 |
JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT | 64 | 9.50 |
REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS | 87 | 8.90 |
Select your rating and start your review of MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
2024-01-30
The speed is really slow. I submitted the article less than two months after the submission period started. According to the website, the first response time is 1.8 months. I submitted on November 3, 2023, and the reviewers started reviewing on November 24. It has been two months since then, and there has been no change. It still shows as under review. In conclusion, I do not recommend submitting due to the slow pace
2023-09-11
2023.7.27 New Submission
2023.7.29 Editor Assigned
2023.7.31 Reviewers Assigned
2023.8.1 Reviewers Assigned
2023.8.12 Under review
2023.8.22 Minor revisions
2023.8.28 Revision Submitted
2023.8.29 Editor Assigned
2023.8.30 Editor Invited
2023.9.6 Editor Assigned
2023.9.9 Accept
2022-06-30
Do you use Chinese signature for signing in the copyright transfer?
2020-07-05
The comments given by the reviewers are very good. I feel that the paper is on a higher level after the revision, and the journal may develop better in the future.
2020-05-23
This journal is too slow. It has still been editor assigned more than a month after submission. I sent an email to the editor and he said it would be processed as soon as possible. But the status remains to be unchanged.
2019-09-01
2019.6.4 Submitted. 2019.6.5 Editor assigned. 2019.7.6 Reviewers assigned. 2019.7.9 Under review. 2019.7.27 Reviewers assigned. 2019.7.28 Under review. 2019.8.4 Reviewers assigned. 2019.8.11 Reviews completed. 2019.8.17 Major revisions. 2019.8.25 revision submitted. 2019.8.26 Editor Assigned. 2019.9.1 Accepted. There were three reviews. Two reviewers who responded positively were with a total of 16 comments. Most of the comments were professional, in which two comments were particularly valuable. I didn't realize them myself. Major revision of the article was carefully made. I feel that I have improved a lot in the process. I hope the journal will get better and better.
2018-07-12
Soon, the questions raised by the reviewers are also very straightforward. The one month after the revision is accepted
2018-04-12
8 On the 20th select, in early January, the reviewer comments, the two reviewers, the opinions are very positive, very positive about the work, put forward some amendments, January 24After the modification and return, it is still two months and a half of the revisions are still Processes Being Processed, I don’t know why it is so slow
2017-11-20
8.13Submission 10.29 reviewer assigned One month or no change
2013-11-28
My article was not accepted. The IF is 1.6.